Paper detail

A possible influence on standard model of quasars and active galactic nuclei in strong magnetic field

Recent observational evidence indicates that the center of our Milky Way harbours a super-massive object with ultra-strong radial magnetic field (Eatough et al., 2013). Here we demonstrate that the radiations observed in the vicinity of the Galactic Center (GC) (Falcke and Marko 2013) cannot be emitted by the gas of the accretion disk since the accreting plasma is prevented from approaching to the GC by the abnormally strong radial magnetic field. These fields obstruct the infalling accretion flow from the inner region of the disk and the central massive black hole in the standard model. It is expected that the observed radiations near the Galactic Center cannot be generated by the central black hole. We also demonstrate that the observed ultra-strong radial magnetic field near the Galactic Center ( Eatough et al., 2013) cannot be generated by the - turbulence dynamo mechanism of Parker since preliminary qualitative estimate in terms of this mechanism gives a magnetic field strength six orders of magnitude smaller than the observed field strength at . However, both these difficulties or the dilemma of the standard model can be overcome if the central black hole in the standard model is replaced by a supper-massive stellar object containing magnetic monopoles ( SMSOMM, Peng and Chou, 2001). The observed power peaking of the thermal radiation is essentially the same as our theoretical prediction. In addition, the discovery of the ultra-strong radial magnetic field near the Galactic Center can be naturally explained and is consistent with the prediction of our model( Peng and Chou 2001). Furthermore, the observed ultra-strong radial magnetic field in the vicinity of the Galactic Center may be considered as the astronomical evidence for the existence of magnetic monopoles as predicted by the Grand Unified Theory of particle physics.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.