Paper detail

A Possible High Nova Rate for Two Local Group Dwarf Galaxies: M32 and NGC 205

We report the results of a preliminary nova survey of Local Group dwarf ellipticals. We used the Tenagra Observatory to observe M32, NGC 205, NGC 147, and NGC 185 in their entirety every clear night over a 4.5 month interval and discovered one nova in M32 and a candidate nova in NGC 205. The nova in M32 was verified spectroscopically. The nova candidate in NGC 205 had an unusually low peak luminosity (M_V = -5.1), and we were unable to obtain spectroscopic verification. We report a high bulk nova rate for M32 of 2(+2.4,-1.0) yr^-1 and, assuming the candidate nova is correctly identified, for NGC 205 of 2(+2.2,-1.0) yr^-1. If the NGC 205 variable is not a nova, we calculate an upper limit on the bulk nova rate for NGC 205 of 1.5 yr^-1. We report upper limits on the bulk nova rates in NGC 147 of 2 yr^-1 and NGC 185 of 1.8 yr^-1 and a combined bulk nova rate for the four galaxies of 4(+4.2,-1.4) yr^-1 (2{+3.9,-1.4} yr^-1 without the NGC 205 nova candidate). From the bulk rates, integrated and extinction corrected V-band photometry, and (V-K)_0 colors we derive a luminosity specific nova rate for M32 of 12.0(+14.4,-6.0) yr^-1 [10^10 L_Sun,K]^-1 and for NGC 205 of 29.3(+32.3,-14.7) yr^-1 [10^10 L_Sun,K]^-1 and for the combined 4 galaxies of 14.1(+14.8,-4.9) yr^-1 [10^10 L_Sun,K]^-1 (7.0{+13.7,-4.9} yr^-1[10^10 L_Sun,K]^-1 without the NGC 205 nova candidate). If the higher rate is confirmed by surveys in subsequent seasons, it would imply that either dwarf ellipticals have a higher interacting binary fraction than their higher mass counter parts, or that the completeness is higher for these less complex systems and the nova rates for larger, more distant systems are systematically underestimated.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.