Paper detail

A possible black hole in the gamma-ray microquasar LS 5039

The population of high energy and very high energy gamma-ray sources, detected with EGRET and the new generation of ground-based Cherenkov telescopes, conforms a reduced but physically important sample. Most of these sources are extragalactic (e.g., blazars), while among the galactic ones there are pulsars and SN remnants. The microquasar LS 5039, previously proposed to be associated with an EGRET source by Paredes et al. (2000), has recently been detected at TeV energies, confirming that microquasars should be regarded as a class of high energy gamma-ray sources. To model and understand how the energetic photons are produced and escape from LS 5039 it is crucial to unveil the nature of the compact object, which remains unknown. Here we present new intermediate-dispersion spectroscopy of this source which, combined with values reported in the literature, provides an orbital period of 3.90603+/-0.00017 d, a mass function f(M)=0.0053+/-0.0009 M_sun, and an eccentricity e=0.35+/-0.04. Atmosphere model fitting to the spectrum of the optical companion, together with our new distance estimate of d=2.5+/-0.1 kpc, yields R_opt=9.3+0.7-0.6 R_sun, log (L_opt/L_sun)=5.26+/-0.06, and M_opt=22.9+3.4-2.9 M_sun. These, combined with our dynamical solution and the assumption of pseudo-synchronization, yield an inclination i=24.9+/-2.8 degree and a compact object mass M_X=3.7+1.3-1.0 M_sun. This is above neutron star masses for most of the standard equations of state and, therefore, we propose that the compact object in LS 5039 is a black hole. We finally discuss about the implications of our orbital solution and new parameters of the binary system on the CNO products, the accretion/ejection energetic balance, the SN explosion scenario, and the behaviour of the TeV emission with the new orbital period.

preprint2005arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.