Paper detail

A positive fraction mutually avoiding sets theorem

Two sets $A$ and $B$ of points in the plane are \emph{mutually avoiding} if no line generated by any two points in $A$ intersects the convex hull of $B$, and vice versa. In 1994, Aronov, Erd\H os, Goddard, Kleitman, Klugerman, Pach, and Schulman showed that every set of $n$ points in the plane in general position contains a pair of mutually avoiding sets each of size at least $\sqrt{n/12}$. As a corollary, their result implies that for every set of $n$ points in the plane in general position one can find at least $\sqrt{n/12}$ segments, each joining two of the points, such that these segments are pairwise crossing. In this note, we prove a fractional version of their theorem: for every $k > 0$ there is a constant $\varepsilon_k > 0$ such that any sufficiently large point set $P$ in the plane contains $2k$ subsets $A_1,\ldots, A_{k},B_1,\ldots, B_k$, each of size at least $\varepsilon_k|P|$, such that every pair of sets $A = \{a_1,\ldots, a_k\}$ and $B = \{b_1,\ldots, b_k\}$, with $a_i \in A_i$ and $b_i \in B_i$, are mutually avoiding. Moreover, we show that $\varepsilon_k = Ω(1/k^4)$. Similar results are obtained in higher dimensions

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.