Paper detail

A Population of Neutron Star Ultraluminous X-ray Sources with A Helium Star Companion

It was recently proposed that a significant fraction of ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) actually host a neutron star (NS) accretor. We have performed a systematic study on the NS ULX population in Milky Way-like galaxies, by combining binary population synthesis and detailed stellar evolution calculations. Besides a normal star, the ULX donor can be a helium star (the hydrogen envelope of its progenitor star was stripped during previous common envelope evolution) if the NS is accreting at a super-Eddington rate via Roche lobe overflow. We find that the NS$-$helium star binaries can significantly contribute the ULX population, with the overall number of about several in a Milky Way-like galaxy. Our calculations show that such ULXs are generally close systems with orbital period distribution peaked at $ \sim 0.1 $ day (with a tail up to $ \sim100 $ days), and the helium stars have relatively low masses distributing with a maximum probability at $ \sim 1M_{\odot} $.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.