Paper detail

A Poncelet Criterion for special pairs of conics in $PG(2,p)$

We study Poncelet's Theorem in finite projective coordinate planes over the field $GF(p)$ and concentrate on a particular pencil of conics. For pairs of such conics we investigate whether we can find polygons with $n$ sides, which are inscribed in one conic and circumscribed about the other, so-called Poncelet Polygons. By using suitable elements of the dihedral group for these pairs, we prove that the length $n$ of such Poncelet Polygons is independent of the starting point. In this sense Poncelet's Porism is valid. By using Euler's divisor sum formula for the totient function, we can make a statement about the number of different conic pairs, which carry Poncelet Polygons of length $n$. Moreover, we will introduce polynomials whose zeros in $GF(p)$ yield information about the relation of a given pair of conics. In particular, we can decide for a given integer $n$, whether and how we can find Poncelet Polygons for pairs of conics in the given coordinate plane. We will see that this condition is closely connected with the theory of quadratic residues.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.