Paper detail

A polynomially accelerated fixed-point iteration for vector problems

Fixed-point solvers are ubiquitous in nonlinear PDEs, yet their progress collapses whenever the Jacobian at the solution carries an eigenvalue arbitrarily close to one. We ask whether such stagnation can be removed without storing long histories or solving dense least squares. Under two assumptions -- (A1) the linearised error $e_n$ is dominated by a multiplier $m$ with $|m|<1$ and (A2) residuals shrink monotonically -- we construct a quadratic blend of three iterates whose error polynomial has a double root at $m$. This three-point polynomial accelerator (TPA) cancels the stubborn mode up to $o(\|e_n\|)$, reduces to Aitken&#39;s $Δ^2$ process in one dimension, and matches a doubly blended Anderson step with depth $m=2$ when the regularisation vanishes, yet it keeps the Picard memory footprint. The only extra ingredient is a residual-based estimate of $w=(1-m)^{-1}$ obtained from a closed-form regularised least-squares fit that remains stable even when two residuals nearly coincide. Numerical experiments on linear systems with clustered spectra, a $320$-dimensional nonlinear $\tanh$ fixed point, and a $50\times 50$ Poisson discretisation show that TPA reaches the $10^{-8}$ residual tolerance in $32$, $36$, and $244$ map evaluations (respectively). In the same settings SOR requires $663$ steps and Anderson acceleration with depth $m=5$ consumes $52$, $38$, and $955$ evaluations. TPA therefore supplies a parameter-free, constant-memory drop-in accelerator whenever a single contraction factor throttles convergence.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.