Paper detail

A Polynomial-Time Approximation Scheme for The Airplane Refueling Problem

We study the airplane refueling problem which was introduced by the physicists Gamow and Stern in their classical book Puzzle-Math (1958). Sticking to the original story behind this problem, suppose we have to deliver a bomb in some distant point of the globe, the distance being much greater than the range of any individual airplane at our disposal. Therefore, the only feasible option to carry out this mission is to better utilize our fleet via mid-air refueling. Starting with several airplanes that can refuel one another, and gradually drop out of the flight until the single plane carrying the bomb reaches the target, how would you plan the refueling policy? The main contribution of Gamow and Stern was to provide a complete characterization of the optimal refueling policy for the special case of identical airplanes. In spite of their elegant and easy-to-analyze solution, the computational complexity of the general airplane refueling problem, with arbitrary tank volumes and consumption rates, has remained widely open ever since, as recently pointed out by Woeginger (Open Problems in Scheduling, Dagstuhl 2010, page 24). To our knowledge, other than a logarithmic approximation, which can be attributed to folklore, it is not entirely obvious even if constant-factor performance guarantees are within reach. In this paper, we propose a polynomial-time approximation scheme for the airplane refueling problem in its utmost generality. Our approach builds on a novel combination of ideas related to parametric pruning, efficient guessing tricks, reductions to well-structured instances of generalized assignment, and additional insight into how LP-rounding algorithms in this context actually work. We complement this result by presenting a fast and easy-to-implement algorithm that approximates the optimal refueling policy to within a constant factor.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.