Paper detail

A Pólya criterion for (strict) positive definiteness on the sphere

Positive definite functions are very important in both theory and applications of approximation theory, probability and statistics. In particular, identifying strictly positive definite kernels is of great interest as interpolation problems corresponding to these kernels are guaranteed to be poised. A Bochner type result of Schoenberg characterises continuous positive definite zonal functions, $f(\cos \cdot)$, on the sphere $\Sdmone$, as those with nonnegative Gegenbauer coefficients. More recent results characterise strictly positive definite functions on $\Sdmone$ by stronger conditions on the signs of the Gegenbauer coefficients. Unfortunately, given a function $f$, checking the signs of all the Gegenbauer coefficients can be an onerous, or impossible, task. Therefore, it is natural to seek simpler sufficient conditions which guarantee (strict) positive definiteness. We state a conjecture which leads to a Pólya type criterion for functions to be (strictly) positive definite on the sphere $\Sdmone$. In analogy to the case of the Euclidean space, the conjecture claims positivity of a certain integral involving Gegenbauer polynomials. We provide a proof of the conjecture for $d$ from 3 to 8.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.