Paper detail

A Poisson Analogue of Noether's Problem

In this paper we show that the Poisson analogue of the Noether's Problem has a positive solution for essentially all finite symplectic reflection groups - the analogue of complex reflection groups in the symplectic world. Our proofs are constructive, and generalize and refines previously known results. As an interesting consequence of the solution of this problem for complex reflection groups, we obtain the Poisson rationality of the Calogero-Moser spaces associated to any complex reflection group. The results of this paper can be thought as analogues of the Noncommutative Noether Problem and the Gelfand-Kirillov Conjecture for rational Cherednik algebras in the 'quasi-classical limit'. In the second half of the paper, an abstract framework to understand these results is introduced, and it is shown that every Coloumb branch of a $3d \, \mathcal{N}=4$ gauge theory is Poisson rational as an application. We also obtain the Gelfand-Kirillov Conjecture for trigonometric Cherednik algebras and the Poisson rationality of their trigonometric Calogero-Moser spaces at the same time.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.