Paper detail

A Pluto--Charon Sonata IV. Improved Constraints on the Dynamical Behavior and Masses of the Small Satellites

We discuss a new set of $\sim$ 500 numerical n-body calculations designed to constrain the masses and bulk densities of Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra. Comparisons of different techniques for deriving the semimajor axis and eccentricity of the four satellites favor methods relying on the theory of Lee & Peale (2006), where satellite orbits are derived in the context of the restricted three body problem (Pluto, Charon, and one massless satellite). In each simulation, we adopt the nominal satellite masses derived in Kenyon & Bromley (2019a), multiply the mass of at least one satellite by a numerical factor $f \ge 1$, and establish whether the system ejects at least one satellite on a time scale $\le$ 4.5 Gyr. When the total system mass is large ($f \gg 1$), ejections of Kerberos are more common. Systems with lower satellite masses ($ f \approx$ 1) usually eject Styx. In these calculations, Styx often `signals' an ejection by moving to higher orbital inclination long before ejection; Kerberos rarely signals in a useful way. The n-body results suggest that Styx and Kerberos are more likely to have bulk densities comparable with water ice, $ρ_{SK} \lesssim$ 2 g cm$^{-3}$, than with rock. A strong upper limit on the total system mass, $M_{SNKH} \lesssim 9.5 \times 10^{19}$ g, also places robust constraints on the average bulk density of the four satellites, $ρ_{SNKH} \lesssim$ 1.4 g cm$^{-3}$. These limits support models where the satellites grow out of icy material ejected during a major impact on Pluto or Charon.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.