Paper detail

A plethora of new R Coronae Borealis stars discovered from a dedicated spectroscopic follow-up survey

It is increasingly suspected that the rare R Coronae Borealis (RCB) stars - hydrogen-deficient and carbon-rich supergiant stars - are the products of mergers of CO/He white-dwarf binary systems in the intermediate mass regime ($0.6<M_{Tot}<1.2 M_{\odot}$). Only 77 RCB stars are currently known in our Galaxy while up to 1000 were expected. It is necessary to find more of these peculiar and diverse stars to understand their origin and evolutionary path. We are undertaking such a dedicated search. We plan to follow up spectroscopically 2356 targets of interest that were carefully selected using the all sky 2MASS and WISE surveys. We have observed nearly 500 of these targets using optical low-resolution spectrographs. These spectra were compared to synthetic spectra from a new grid of MARCs hydrogen-deficient atmospheric models. Classical RCB stars' photospheric temperatures range mostly from 4000 K to about 8500 K, and therefore their spectra look very different showing the presence of carbon molecules C$_2$ and CN up to $\sim$6800 K and solely atomic absorption lines above that. We have put in place a series of criteria to distinguish RCB stars from other AGB carbon-rich stars. We found 45 new RCB stars, including 30 Cold ($4000<T_{eff}<6800$ K), 14 Warm ($6800<T_{eff}<8500$ K) and one hot RCB ($T_{eff}>15000$ K). Forty of these belong to the Milky Way and five are located in the Magellanic Clouds. We also confirmed that the long lasting candidate KDM 5651 is indeed a new Magellanic RCB star, increasing the total number of Magellanic Cloud RCB stars to 30. We have increased by $\sim$50\% the total number of RCB stars known, now reaching 147. We also include a list of 14 strong RCB candidates, most certainly observed during a dust obscuration phase. From the detection efficiency and success rate so far, we estimate that there should be no more than 500 RCB stars/HdC stars in the Milky Way.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.