Paper detail

A pilot study of the Earable device to measure facial muscle and eye movement tasks among healthy volunteers

Many neuromuscular disorders impair function of cranial nerve enervated muscles. Clinical assessment of cranial muscle function has several limitations. Clinician rating of symptoms suffers from inter-rater variation, qualitative or semi-quantitative scoring, and limited ability to capture infrequent or fluctuating symptoms. Patient-reported outcomes are limited by recall bias and poor precision. Current tools to measure orofacial and oculomotor function are cumbersome, difficult to implement, and non-portable. Here, we show how Earable, a wearable device, can discriminate certain cranial muscle activities such as chewing, talking, and swallowing. We demonstrate using data from a pilot study of 10 healthy participants how Earable can be used to measure features from EMG, EEG, and EOG waveforms from subjects performing mock Performance Outcome Assessments (mock-PerfOs), utilized widely in clinical research. Our analysis pipeline provides a framework for how to computationally process and statistically rank features from the Earable device. Finally, we demonstrate that Earable data may be used to classify these activities. Our results, conducted in a pilot study of healthy participants, enable a more comprehensive strategy for the design, development, and analysis of wearable sensor data for investigating clinical populations. Additionally, the results from this study support further evaluation of Earable or similar devices as tools to objectively measure cranial muscle activity in the context of a clinical research setting. Future work will be conducted in clinical disease populations, with a focus on detecting disease signatures, as well as monitoring intra-subject treatment responses. Readily available quantitative metrics from wearable sensor devices like Earable support strategies for the development of novel digital endpoints, a hallmark goal of clinical research.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.