Paper detail

A Picard Newton method to solve non linear airflow networks

In detailled buiding simulation models, airflow modelling and solving are still open and crucial problems, specially in the case of open buildings as encountered in tropical climates. As a consequence, wind speed conditioning indoor thermal comfort or energy needs in case of air conditionning are uneasy to predict. A first part of the problem is the lack of reliable and usable large opening elementary modelling and another one concerns the numerical solving of airflow network. This non linear pressure system is solved by numerous methods mainly based on Newton Raphson (NR) method. This paper is adressing this part of the difficulty, in our software CODYRUN. After model checks, we propose to use Picard method (known also as fixed point) to initialise zone pressures. A linear system (extracted from the non linear set of equations) is solved around 10 times at each time step and NR uses this result for initial values. Known to be uniformly but slowly convergent, this method appears to be really powerful for the building pressure system. The comparison of the methods in terms of number of iterations is illustrated using a real test case experiment.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.