Paper detail

A physics-inspired alternative to spatial filtering for large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows

Large-eddy simulations (LES) are widely-used for computing high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Spatial filtering theory for LES is not without its shortcomings, including how to define filtering for wall-bounded flows, commutation errors for non-uniform filters, and extensibility to flows with additional complexity, such as multiphase flows. In this paper, the theory for LES is reimagined using a coarsening procedure that imitates nature. This physics-inspired approach is equivalent to Gaussian filtering for single-phase wall-free flows but opens up new insights for modeling even in that simple case. Boundaries and nonuniform resolution can be treated seemlessly in this framework without commutation errors, and the divergence-free condition is retained for incompressible flows. An alternative to the Germano identity is introduced and used to define a dynamic procedure without the need for a test filter. Potential extensions to more complex physics are briefly discussed.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.