Paper detail

A physico-chemical model to study the ion densitydistribution in the inner coma of comet C/2016 R2(Pan-STARRS)

The recent observations show that comet C/2016 R2 (Pan-Starrs) has a unique and peculiar composition when compared with several other comets observed at 2.8 au heliocentric distance. Assuming solar resonance fluorescence is the only excitation source, the observed ionic emission intensity ratios are used to constrain the corresponding neutral abundances in this comet. We developed a physico-chemical model to study the ion density distribution in the inner coma of this comet by accounting for photon and electron impact ionization of neutrals, charge exchange and proton transfer reactions between ions and neutrals, and electron-ion thermal recombination reactions. Our calculations show that CO2+ and CO+ are the major ions in the inner coma, and close to the surface of nucleus CH3OH+, CH3OH2+ and O2+ are also important ions. By considering various excitation sources, we also studied the emission mechanisms of different excited states of CO+, CO2+, N2+, and H2O+. We found that the photon and electron impact ionization and excitation of corresponding neutrals significantly contribute to the observed ionic emissions for radial distances smaller than 300 km and at larger distances, solar resonance fluorescence is the major excitation source. Our modelled ion emission intensity ratios are consistent with the ground-based observations. Based on the modelled emission processes, we suggest that the observed ion emission intensity ratios can be used to derive the neutral composition in the cometary coma only when the ion densities are significantly controlled by photon and photoelectron impact ionization of neutrals rather than by the ion-neutral chemistry.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.