Paper detail

A physical version of the QCD confinement scale(s)

We suggest a physical definition of the confinement mass scale in QCD in the framework of non-perturbative, gauge invariant QCD, where all possible gluons exchanged between any pair of quark lines are included; and we insist that a stable, quark bound state should not and must not have transverse quark fluctuations larger than the Compton wavelength of the bound state particle itself. This is possible in our QCD formulation because there are two parameters which describe confinement, a mass scale $μ$, and a "deformation parameter" $ξ$, which shrinks the transverse-quark-coordinate separation distribution $φ(b)$ away from Gaussian. With the mass scale $μ$ defined as equal to the mass of each quark bound state, we show that $ξ$ decreases with increasing bound state mass, $m_{BS}$, using order-of-magnitude estimates which agree with obvious intuition. Our $ξ$-values, including a calculation for the recently detected 4-quark system, display the predicted behavior: $ξ$ decreases with increasing $m_{BS}$. Our results for $φ(b)$, when the quark bound state is a nucleon or heavier, then show agreement with the form of Gaussian momentum-space fall-offs in recent Light-Front holographic analyses.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.