Paper detail

A physical model for the evolving UV luminosity function of high redshift galaxies and their contribution to the cosmic reionization

[Abridged] We present a physical model for the evolution of the ultraviolet (UV) luminosity function (LF) of high-z galaxies taking into account in a self-consistent way their chemical evolution and the associated evolution of dust extinction. The model yields good fits of the UV and Lyman-alpha LFs at z>~2. The weak evolution of both LFs between z=2 and z=6 is explained as the combined effect of the negative evolution of the halo mass function, of the increase with redshift of the star formation efficiency, and of dust extinction. The slope of the faint end of the UV LF is found to steepen with increasing redshift, implying that low luminosity galaxies increasingly dominate the contribution to the UV background at higher and higher redshifts. The observed range of UV luminosities at high-z implies a minimum halo mass capable of hosting active star formation M_crit <~ 10^9.8 M_odot, consistent with the constraints from hydrodynamical simulations. From fits of Lyman-alpha LFs plus data on the luminosity dependence of extinction and from the measured ratios of non-ionizing UV to Lyman-continuum flux density for samples of z=~3 Lyman break galaxies and Lyman-alpha emitters, we derive a simple relationship between the escape fraction of ionizing photons and the star formation rate, impling larger escape fraction for less massive galaxies. Galaxies already represented in the UV LF (M_UV <~ -18) can keep the universe fully ionized up to z=~6, consistent with (uncertain) data pointing to a rapid drop of the ionization degree above z~6. On the other side, the electron scattering optical depth, tau_es, inferred from CMB experiments favor an ionization degree close to unity up to z=~9-10. Consistency with CMB data can be achieved if M_crit =~ 10^8.5 M_odot, implying that the UV LFs extend to M_UV =~ -13, although the corresponding tau_es is still on the low side of CMB-based estimates.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.