Paper detail

A photochemical model of ultraviolet atomic line emissions in the inner coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Alice ultraviolet spectrometer onboard Rosetta space mission observed several spectroscopic emissions emanated from volatile species of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (hear after 67P/C-G) during its entire escorting phase. We have developed a photochemical model for comet 67P/C-G to study the atomic hydrogen (HI 1216, 1025, & 973 Ang), oxygen (OI 1152, 1304, & 1356 Ang), and carbon (CI 1561 & 1657 Ang) line emissions by accounting for major production pathways. The developed model has been used to calculate the emission intensities of these lines as a function of nucleocentric projected distance and also along with the nadir view by varying the input parameters, viz., neutral abundances and cross sections. We have quantified the percentage contributions of photon and electron impact dissociative excitation processes to the total intensity of the emission lines, which has important relevance for the analysis of Alice observed spectra. It is found that in comet 67P/C-G, which is having a neutral gas production rate of about 10$^{27}$ s$^{-1}$ when it was at 1.56 AU from the Sun, photodissociative excitation processes are more significant compared to electron impact reactions in determining the atomic emission intensities. Based on our model calculations, we suggest that the observed atomic hydrogen, oxygen, and carbon emission intensities can be used to derive H$_2$O, O$_2$, and CO, abundances, respectively, rather than electron density in the coma of 67P/C-G, when the comet has a gas production rate of $\ge$ 10$^{27}$ s$^{-1}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.