Paper detail

A phase transition in the evolution of bootstrap percolation processes on preferential attachment graphs

The theme of this paper is the analysis of bootstrap percolation processes on random graphs generated by preferential attachment. This is a class of infection processes where vertices have two states: they are either infected or susceptible. At each round every susceptible vertex which has at least $r\geq 2$ infected neighbours becomes infected and remains so forever. Assume that initially $a(t)$ vertices are randomly infected, where $t$ is the total number of vertices of the graph. Suppose also that $r < m$, where $2m$ is the average degree. We determine a critical function $a_c(t)$ such that when $a(t) \gg a_c(t)$, complete infection occurs with high probability as $t \rightarrow \infty$, but when $a(t) \ll a_c (t)$, then with high probability the process evolves only for a bounded number of rounds and the final set of infected vertices is asymptotically equal to $a(t)$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.