Paper detail

A Perturbation Inequality for the Schatten-$p$ Quasi-Norm and Its Applications to Low-Rank Matrix Recovery

In this paper, we establish the following perturbation result concerning the singular values of a matrix: Let $A,B \in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$ be given matrices, and let $f:\mathbb{R}_+\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_+$ be a concave function satisfying $f(0)=0$. Then, we have $$ \sum_{i=1}^{\min\{m,n\}} \big| f(σ_i(A)) - f(σ_i(B)) \big| \le \sum_{i=1}^{\min\{m,n\}} f(σ_i(A-B)), $$ where $σ_i(\cdot)$ denotes the $i$--th largest singular value of a matrix. This answers an open question that is of interest to both the compressive sensing and linear algebra communities. In particular, by taking $f(\cdot)=(\cdot)^p$ for any $p \in (0,1]$, we obtain a perturbation inequality for the so--called Schatten $p$--quasi--norm, which allows us to confirm the validity of a number of previously conjectured conditions for the recovery of low--rank matrices via the popular Schatten $p$--quasi--norm heuristic. We believe that our result will find further applications, especially in the study of low--rank matrix recovery.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.