Paper detail

A persistent homology-based topological loss function for multi-class CNN segmentation of cardiac MRI

With respect to spatial overlap, CNN-based segmentation of short axis cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images has achieved a level of performance consistent with inter observer variation. However, conventional training procedures frequently depend on pixel-wise loss functions, limiting optimisation with respect to extended or global features. As a result, inferred segmentations can lack spatial coherence, including spurious connected components or holes. Such results are implausible, violating the anticipated topology of image segments, which is frequently known a priori. Addressing this challenge, published work has employed persistent homology, constructing topological loss functions for the evaluation of image segments against an explicit prior. Building a richer description of segmentation topology by considering all possible labels and label pairs, we extend these losses to the task of multi-class segmentation. These topological priors allow us to resolve all topological errors in a subset of 150 examples from the ACDC short axis CMR training data set, without sacrificing overlap performance.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.