Paper detail

A Path to Higher Q0 with Large Grain Niobium Cavities

The improvement of the quality factor Q0 of superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavities at medium accelerating gradients (20-25 MV/m) is important in order to reduce the cryogenic losses in continuous wave (CW) accelerators used for a variety of applications. In recent years, SRF cavities fabricated from ingot niobium have become a viable alternative to standard high-purity fine-grain Nb for the fabrication of high-performing SRF cavities with the possibility of significant cost reduction. Recent studies demonstrated the improvement of Q0 at medium field in cavities heat treated at 800-1200 °C without subsequent chemical etching [ ]. To further explore this treatment procedure, a new induction furnace with an all-niobium hot-zone was commissioned [ ]. A single-cell 1.5 GHz cavity fabricated from ingot material from CBMM, Brazil, with RRR 200, was heat treated in the new furnace in the temperature range 800-1400 °C for several hours. Residual resistance value of 1 - 5 nΩhave been consistently achieved on this cavity Q0-values as high as 4.6\times1010 at 90 mT peak surface magnetic field at 2 K. Q0 values of about ~2\times1011 have been measured at 1.5 K.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.