Paper detail

A partial inventory of observational anisotropies in single-dish line-intensity mapping

Line-intensity mapping, being an imperfect observation of the line-intensity field in a cosmological volume, will be subject to various anisotropies introduced in observation. Existing literature in the context of CO and [C II] line-intensity mapping often predicts only the real-space, spherically averaged line-intensity power spectrum, with some works considering anisotropies while examining projection of interloper emission. We explicitly consider a simplified picture of redshift-space distortions and instrumental effects due to limited resolution, and how these distort an isotropic line-intensity signal in real space and introduce strong apparent anisotropies. The results suggest that while signal loss due to limited instrumental resolution is unavoidable, measuring the quadrupole power spectrum in addition to the monopole would still break parameter degeneracies present in monopole-only constraints, even without a measurement of the full anisotropic power spectrum.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.