Paper detail

A Parametrized Galaxy Catalog Simulator For Testing Cluster Finding, Mass Estimation and Photometric Redshift Estimation in Optical and Near Infrared Surveys

We present a galaxy catalog simulator which turns N-body simulations with subhalos into multiband photometric mocks. The simulator assigns galaxy properties to each subhalo to reproduce the observed cluster galaxy halo occupation distribution, the radial and mass dependent variation in fractions of blue galaxies, the luminosity functions in clusters and the field, and the red-sequence in clusters. Moreover, the evolution of these parameters is tuned to match existing observational constraints. Field galaxies are sampled from existing multiband photometric surveys using derived galaxy photometric redshifts. Parametrizing an ensemble of cluster galaxy properties enables us to create mock catalogs with variations in those properties, which in turn allows us to quantify the sensitivity of cluster finding to current observational uncertainties in these properties. We present an application of the catalog simulator to characterize the selection function of a galaxy cluster finder that utilizes the cluster red-sequence galaxy clustering on the sky, in terms of completeness and contamination. We estimate systematic uncertainties due to the observational uncertainties on our simulator parameters in determining the selection function using five different sets of modified catalogs. Our estimates indicate that these uncertainties are at the $\le15$% level with current observational constraints on cluster galaxy populations and their evolution. In addition, we examine the $B_{gc}$ parameter as an optical mass indicator and measure the intrinsic scatter of the $B_{gc}$--mass relation to be approximately log normal with $σ_{\log_{10}M}\sim0.25$. Finally, we present tests of a red sequence overdensity redshift estimator using both simulated and real data, showing that it delivers redshifts for massive clusters with $\sim$2% accuracy out to redshifts $z\sim0.5$ with SDSS-like datasets.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.