Paper detail

A Parametric Worst-Case Approach to Fairness in TU-Cooperative Games

We propose a parametric family of measures of fairness in allocations of TU-cooperative games. Their definition is based on generalized Renyi Entropy, is related to the Cowell-Kuga generalized entropy indices in welfare economics, and aims to parallel the spirit of the notion of price of anarchy in the case of convex TU-cooperative games. Since computing these indices is NP-complete in general, we first upper bound the performance of a "reverse greedy" algorithm for approximately computing worst-case fairness. The result provides a general additive error guarantee in terms of two (problem dependent) packing constants. We then particularize this result to the class of induced subset games. For such games computing worst-case fairness is NP-complete, and the additive guarantee constant can be explicitly computed. We compare this result to the performance of an alternate algorithm based on "biased orientations".

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.