Paper detail

A parameter identification problem in stochastic homogenization

In porous media physics, calibrating model parameters through experiments is a challenge. This process is plagued with errors that come from modelling, measurement and computation of the macroscopic observables through random homogenization -- the forward problem -- as well as errors coming from the parameters fitting procedure -- the inverse problem. In this work, we address these issues by considering a least-square formulation to identify parameters of the microscopic model on the basis on macroscopic observables. In particular, we discuss the selection of the macroscopic observables which we need to know in order to uniquely determine these parameters. To gain a better intuition and explore the problem without a too high computational load, we mostly focus on the one-dimensional case. We show that the Newton algorithm can be efficiently used to robustly determine optimal parameters, even if some small statistical noise is present in the system.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.