Paper detail

A parallelizable sampling method for parameter inference of large biochemical reaction models

The development of mechanistic models of biological systems is a central part of Systems Biology. One major task in developing these models is the inference of the correct model parameters. Due to the size of most realistic models and their possibly complex dynamical behaviour one must usually rely on sample based methods. In this paper we present a novel algorithm that reliably estimates model parameters for deterministic as well as stochastic models from trajectory data. Our algorithm samples iteratively independent particles from the level sets of the likelihood and recovers the posterior from these level sets. The presented approach is easily parallelizable and, by utilizing density estimation through Dirichlet Process Gaussian Mixture Models, can deal with high dimensional parameter spaces. We illustrate that our algorithm is applicable to large, realistic deterministic and stochastic models and succeeds in inferring the correct posterior from a given number of observed trajectories. This algorithm presents a novel, computationally feasible approach to identify parameters of large biochemical reaction models based on sample path data.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.