Paper detail

A Parallel-pulling Protocol for Free-Energy Evaluation

Jarzynski's equality (JE) allows us to compute free energy differences from distributions of work. In molecular dynamics simulations, the traditional way of constructing work distributions is to perform as many pulling simulations as possible. But reliable work distributions are not always produced in a finite number of simulations. The computational cost of using JE is not less than other commonly used methods such as Thermodynamic Integration and Umbrella Sampling methods. Here we first show a different proof of JE based on the idea of step-wise pulling procedures that is efficient in computing free energies by using JE. The key point in our proof is that the processes of turning-on/off a harmonic potential to perform work are described by double Heaviside functions of time. We then show that the distributions of work performed by the potential can be easily generated from the distributions of a reaction coordinate along a pathway. Based on the proof, we propose sequential and parallel step-wise pulling protocols for generating work distributions that require suitable relaxation time at each pulling step. The criterion for reliable work distributions is that there must be sufficient mutual overlaps between the adjacent distributions of the reaction coordinate along the pathway. We arrive at an alternative formula (besides JE) to compute free energy differences from the averaged values of the reaction coordinate. The combination of JE and the alternative formula provides a viable way to determine the accuracy of computed free energy differences. For the stretching of a deca-alanine molecule, our approach requires 21 parallel simulations and relaxation time as small as 0.4 ns for each simulation to estimate free energy differences with an uncertainty of about 13%.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.