Paper detail

A Paradox of Whistling Atmospherics

Analyzing paradoxes is interesting and instructive. Sometimes the analysis leads to non-trivial results. This methodological note sets out a paradox arising in the theory of propagation of electromagnetic waves in moving plasmas. The paradox is interesting in itself, and, generally speaking, it should be taken into account when analyzing geoelectromagnetic waves. The paradox is as follows: contrary to expectations, the group velocity of the waves is the same in the comoving and laboratory frames of reference. The condition for the appearance of the paradox is the quadratic dependence of the frequency on the wave number. A paradoxical property manifests itself in the theory of the propagation of radio waves (in particular, whistling atmospherics), Langmuir waves and Alfvén waves. From a cognitive point of view, it is interesting that the paradox can be traced in relation to de Broglie waves. An explanation of the paradox is proposed. Keywords: group velocity, moving plasma, Doppler Effect, dispersion, longitudinal waves, transverse waves.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.