Paper detail

A numerical study on combustion mode characterization for locally stratified dual-fuel mixtures

Combustion modes in locally stratified dual-fuel (DF) mixtures are numerically investigated for methanol n-dodecane blends under engine-relevant pressures. In the studied constant-volume numerical setup, methanol acts as a background low-reactivity fuel (LRF) while n-dodecane serves as high-reactivity fuel (HRF), controlling local ignition delay time. The spatial distribution of n-dodecane is modeled as a sinusoidal function parametrized by stratification amplitude (Y) and wavelength (0.01 mm<$λ$<15 mm). In contrast, methanol is assumed to be fully premixed with air at equivalence ratio 0.8. First, one-dimensional setup is investigated by hundreds of chemical kinetics simulations in (Y,$λ$) parameter space. Further, the concepts by Sankaran et al. 2005 and Zeldovich 1980 on ignition front propagation speed are applied to develop a theoretical analysis of the time-dependent diffusion-reaction problem. The theoretical analysis predicts two combustion modes, 1) spontaneous ignition and 2) deflagrative propagation, and leads to an analytical expression for the border curve called $β$-curve herein. One-dimensional chemical kinetics simulations confirm the presence of two combustion modes in (Y,$λ$) parameter space while the $β$-curve explains consistently the position of phase border observed in the simulations. Finally, the role of convective mixing is incorporated to the theoretical expression for the $β$-curve. The effect of convection on combustion mode is assessed by carrying out two-dimensional fully-resolved simulations with different turbulence levels. Two-dimensional numerical simulation results give evidence on combustion mode switching, which is consistent with predictions of the modified $β$-curve for turbulent cases. The practical output of the paper is the $β$-curve which is proposed as a predictive tool to estimate combustion modes ...

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.