Paper detail

A numerical study of the the response of transient inhomogeneous flames to pressure fluctuations and negative stretch in contracting hydrogen/air flames

Transient premixed hydrogen/air flames contracting through inhomogeneous fuel distributions and subjected to stretch and pressure oscillations are investigated numerically using an implicit method which couples the fully compressible flow to the realistic chemistry and multicomponent transport properties. The impact of increasing {\em negative} stretch is investigated through the use of planar, cylindrical and spherical geometries, and a comparison with the results from {\em positively} stretched expanding H2/air flames (MALIK2010) and CH4/air flames (MALIK2012a) is made. A flame relaxation number $n_R=τ_R/τ_L$ ($τ_R$ is the time that the flame takes to return to the mean equilibrium conditions after initial disturbance; $τ_L$ is a flame time scale) decreases by 10\% with increasing {\em negative} stretch, in contrast to the two expanding flames where $n_R$ decreased by 40\% with increasing {\em positive} stretch. $n_R$ appears to much more sensitive to variations in positive/negative curvature than to the thermo-chemistry of different flame types. $n_R$ may thus be a useful indicator of the strength of flame-curvature coupling. The spectra of pressure fluctuations $E_p(ω)$ scale close to $\simω^{-3}$, which is steeper than in the expanding H2/air flames where $E_p(ω)\simω^{-2}$. Rapid transport ('flapping') of the flame front by the largest convective velocities induced by the random pressure fluctuations is prominent because of the lack of gas velocity ahead of the flame, $u_g=0$. 'Memory effects' between fuel consumption and the rate of heat release is obscured by the flapping, although the contracting flames display short time-lags in the mean.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.