Paper detail

A numerical stability investigation of strong ZND detonations for Majda's model

We carry out a systematic numerical stability analysis of ZND detonations of Majda's model with Arrhenius-type ignition function, a simplified model for reacting flow, as heat release and activation energy are varied. Our purpose is, first, to answer a question of Majda whether oscillatory instabilities can occur for high activation energies as in the full reacting Euler equations, and, second, to test the efficiency of various versions of a numerical eigenvalue-finding scheme suggested by Humpherys and Zumbrun against the standard method of Lee and Stewart. Our results suggest that instabilities do not occur for Majda's model with Arrhenius-type ignition function, nor with a modified Arrhenius-type ignition function suggested by Lyng--Zumbrun, even in the high-activation energy limit. We find that the algorithm of Humpherys--Zumbrun is in the context of Majda's model $100$-$1,000$ times faster than the one described in the classical work of Lee and Stewart and $1$-$10$ times faster than an optimized version of the Lee--Stewart algorithm using an adaptive-mesh ODE solver

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.