Paper detail

A numerical investigation on active and passive scalars in isotropic compressible turbulence

In this paper, we investigated the statistical differences between active and passive scalars in isotropic compressible turbulence. In the inertial range, the kinetic energy and scalar have the Kolmogorov spectra, and the Kolmogorov and Obukhov-Corrsin constants are 2.06 and 0.87, respectively. The local scaling exponents computed from the second-order structure functions exist plateaus for velocity and active scalar, while that for passive scalar takes first a minimum of 0.61 then a maximum of 0.73. The mixed third-order structure function of velocity and passive scalar satisfies the 4/3-law. For the scaling exponent, the one of velocity and passive scalar mixing is between those of velocity and passive scalar, while the one of velocity and active scalar mixing is below those of velocity and active scalar. At large amplitudes, the p.d.f. of active scalar fluctuations is super-Gaussian, whereas that of passive scalar fluctuations is sub-Gaussian. Moreover, the p.d.f.s of the two scalar increments are concave and convex shapes, respectively, which exhibit strong intermittency at small scales, and approach Gaussian as scale increases. The active scalar has "ramp-cliff" structures, while the passive scalar seems to be dominated by rarefaction and compression. By employing a "coarse-graining" approach, we study scalar cascades. Unlike passive scalar, the cascade of active scalar is mainly determined by the viscous dissipation at small scales and the pressure-dilatation at large scales, where the latter is substantial in the vicinity of small-scale shocklets but is negligible after space averages, because of the cancelations between rarefaction and compression regions. Finally, in the inertial range, the p.d.f.s for the subgrid-scale fluxes of scalars can collapse to the same distribution, revealing the scale-invariant feature for the statistics of active and passive scalars.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.