Paper detail

A null test of the Cosmological Principle with BAO measurements

The assumption of a Friedmann-Lemaître-Roberton-Walker (FLRW) Universe is one of the fundamental pillars of modern Cosmology. It is crucial to confront it against cosmological observations in order to confirm (or rule out) the validity of the $Λ$CDM paradigm. We perform a consistency test of the FLRW metric using measurements of both radial and transversal modes of Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations in a model-independent fashion using Gaussian Processes. The impact of different prior assumptions for the sound horizon scale and the Hubble Constant is also explored. We find a mild deviation of the FLRW hypothesis ($\gtrsim 3σ$ confidence level) at lower redshift ranges ($0.1<z<0.3$) under the assumption the SH0ES $H_0$ prior, which does not occur for the $H_0$ prior by Planck. We also find that different reconstruction kernels reduce the statistical significance of such a deviation. At higher reshift ranges, the null test are able to confirm the FLRW assumption within $3σ$ confidence level regardless of the priors.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.