Paper detail

A Nozzle Analysis of Slow-Acceleration Solutions in One-Dimensional Models of Rotating Hot-Star Winds

We analyze the steady 1D flow equations for a rotating stellar wind based on a ``nozzle'' analogy for terms that constrain the local mass flux. For low rotation, we find the nozzle minimum occurs near the stellar surface, allowing a transition to a standard, CAK-type steep-acceleration solution; but for rotations > 75% of the critical rate, this inner nozzle minimum exceeds the global minimum, implying near-surface supercritical solutions would have an overloaded mass loss rate. In steady, analytic models in which the acceleration is assumed to be monotonically positive, this leads the solution to switch to a slow acceleration mode. However, time-dependent simulations using a numerical hydrodynamics code show that, for rotation rates 75 - 85% of critical, the flow can develop abrupt "kink" transitions from a steep acceleration to a decelerating solution. For rotations above 85% of critical, the hydrodynamic simulations confirm the slow acceleration, with the lower flow speed implying densities 5 - 30 times higher than the polar (or a nonrotating) wind. Still, when gravity darkening and 2D flow effects are accounted for, it seems unlikely that rotationally modified equatorial wind outflows could account for the very large densities inferred for the equatorial regions around B[e] supergiants.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.