Paper detail

A Novel Method for Inference of Acyclic Chemical Compounds with Bounded Branch-height Based on Artificial Neural Networks and Integer Programming

Analysis of chemical graphs is a major research topic in computational molecular biology due to its potential applications to drug design. One approach is inverse quantitative structure activity/property relationship (inverse QSAR/QSPR) analysis, which is to infer chemical structures from given chemical activities/properties. Recently, a framework has been proposed for inverse QSAR/QSPR using artificial neural networks (ANN) and mixed integer linear programming (MILP). This method consists of a prediction phase and an inverse prediction phase. In the first phase, a feature vector $f(G)$ of a chemical graph $G$ is introduced and a prediction function $ψ$ on a chemical property $π$ is constructed with an ANN. In the second phase, given a target value $y^*$ of property $π$, a feature vector $x^*$ is inferred by solving an MILP formulated from the trained ANN so that $ψ(x^*)$ is close to $y^*$ and then a set of chemical structures $G^*$ such that $f(G^*)= x^*$ is enumerated by a graph search algorithm. The framework has been applied to the case of chemical compounds with cycle index up to 2. The computational results conducted on instances with $n$ non-hydrogen atoms show that a feature vector $x^*$ can be inferred for up to around $n=40$ whereas graphs $G^*$ can be enumerated for up to $n=15$. When applied to the case of chemical acyclic graphs, the maximum computable diameter of $G^*$ was around up to around 8. We introduce a new characterization of graph structure, "branch-height," based on which an MILP formulation and a graph search algorithm are designed for chemical acyclic graphs. The results of computational experiments using properties such as octanol/water partition coefficient, boiling point and heat of combustion suggest that the proposed method can infer chemical acyclic graphs $G^*$ with $n=50$ and diameter 30.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.