Paper detail

A novel experimental method of estimating tracer and intrinsic diffusion coefficients from multicomponent diffusion profiles

A few decades earlier, Kirkaldy and Lane proposed an indirect method of estimating the tracer and intrinsic diffusion coefficients in a ternary system (without showing experimental verification), which is otherwise impossible following the Kirkendall marker experiments. Subsequently, Manning proposed the relations between the tracer and intrinsic diffusion coefficients in the multicomponent system by extending the Onsager formalism (although could not be estimated by intersecting the diffusion couples). By solving these issues in this article, we have now proposed the equations and method for estimating these parameters in pseudo-ternary diffusion couples in which diffusion paths can be intersected in multicomponent space. We have chosen NiCoFeCr system for verification of this method because of the availability of good quality diffusion couple experiments and estimated tracer diffusion coefficients of all the components measured by the radiotracer method. An excellent match is found when the tracer diffusion coefficients estimated following the newly proposed method are compared with the data estimated following the radiotracer method. Following, the intrinsic diffusion coefficients are estimated experimentally in a multicomponent system for the first time highlighting diffusional interactions between the components. We have further shown that the intrinsic diffusion coefficients are the same (if the vacancy wind effect is negligible/neglected) when estimated from other types of diffusion couples (pseudo-binary and body diagonal) in the same multi-component system. This method can be now extended to the Al, Ga, Si containing systems in which the estimation of tracer diffusion coefficients following the radiotracer method is difficult/impossible because of various reasons.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.