Paper detail

A Novel Epidemiological Approach to Geographically Mapping Population Dry Eye Disease in the United States through Google Trends

Dry eye disease (DED) affects approximately half of the United States population. DED is characterized by dryness on the corena surface due to a variety of causes. This study fills the spatiotemporal gaps in DED epidemiology by using Google Trends as a novel epidemiological tool for geographically mapping DED in relation to environmental risk factors. We utilized Google Trends to extract DED-related queries estimating user intent from 2004-2019 in the United States. We incorporated national climate data to generate heat maps comparing geographic, temporal, and environmental relationships of DED. Multi-variable regression models were constructed to generate quadratic forecasts predicting DED and control searches. Our results illustrated the upward trend, seasonal pattern, environmental influence, and spatial relationship of DED search volume across US geography. Localized patches of DED interest were visualized along the coastline. There was no significant difference in DED queries across US census regions. Regression model 1 predicted DED searches over time (R^2=0.97) with significant predictors being control queries (p=0.0024), time (p=0.001), and seasonality (Winter p=0.0028; Spring p<0.001; Summer p=0.018). Regression model 2 predicted DED queries per state (R^2=0.49) with significant predictors being temperature (p=0.0003) and coastal zone (p=0.025). Importantly, temperature, coastal status, and seasonality were stronger risk factors of DED searches than humidity, sunshine, pollution, or region as clinical literature may suggest. Our work paves the way for future exploration of geographic information systems for locating DED and other diseases via online search query metrics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.