Paper detail

A note on the shameful conjecture

Let $P_G(q)$ denote the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices. The `shameful conjecture' due to Bartels and Welsh states that, $$\frac{P_G(n)}{P_G(n-1)} \geq \frac{n^n}{(n-1)^n}.$$ Let $μ(G)$ denote the expected number of colors used in a uniformly random proper $n$-coloring of $G$. The above inequality can be interpreted as saying that $μ(G) \geq μ(O_n)$, where $O_n$ is the empty graph on $n$ nodes. This conjecture was proved by F. M. Dong, who in fact showed that, $$\frac{P_G(q)}{P_G(q-1)} \geq \frac{q^n}{(q-1)^n}$$ for all $q \geq n$. There are examples showing that this inequality is not true for all $q \geq 2$. In this paper, we show that the above inequality holds for all $q \geq 36D^{3/2}$, where $D$ is the largest degree of $G$. It is also shown that the above inequality holds true for all $q \geq 2$ when $G$ is a claw-free graph.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.