Paper detail

A note on the rank of a sparse random matrix

Let $\mathbf{A}_{n,m;k}$ be a random $n \times m$ matrix with entries from some field $\mathbb{F}$ where there are exactly $k$ non-zero entries in each column, whose locations are chosen independently and uniformly at random from the set of all ${n \choose k}$ possibilities. In a previous paper (arXiv:1806.04988), we considered the rank of a random matrix in this model when the field is $\mathbb{F}=GF(2)$. In this note, we point out that with minimal modifications, the arguments from that paper actually allow analogous results when the field $\mathbb{F}$ is arbitrary. In particular, for any field $\mathbb{F}$ and any fixed $k\geq 3$, we determine an asymptotically correct estimate for the rank of $\mathbf{A}_{n,m;k}$ in terms of $c,n,k$ where $m=cn/k$, and $c$ is a constant. This formula works even when the values of the nonzero elements are adversarially chosen. When $\mathbb{F}$ is a finite field, we also determine the threshold for having full row rank, when the values of the nonzero elements are randomly chosen.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.