Paper detail

A Note on the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi Conjecture for Vector Spaces

Let $V$ be an $n$-dimensional vector space over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$. Define a real-valued weight function on the $1$-dimensional vector spaces of $V$ such that the sum of all weights is zero. Let the weight of a subspace $S$ be the sum of the weights of the $1$-dimensional subspaces contained in $S$. In 1988 Manickam and Singhi conjectured that if $n \geq 4k$, then the number of $k$-dimensional subspaces with nonnegative weight is at least the number of $k$-dimensional subspaces on a fixed $1$-dimensional subspace. Recently, Chowdhury, Huang, Sarkis, Shahriari, and Sudakov proved the conjecture of Manickam and Singhi for $n \geq 3k$. We modify the technique used by Chowdhury et al. to prove the conjecture for $n \geq 2k$ if $q$ is large. Furthermore, if equality holds and $n \geq 2k+1$, then the set of $k$-dimensional subspaces with nonnegative weight is the set of all $k$-dimensional subspaces on a fixed $1$-dimensional subspace.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.