Paper detail

A note on the Hamiltonian of the real scalar field

We address the question of ambiguity in defining a Hamiltonian for a scalar field. We point out that the Hamiltonian for a real Klein-Gordon scalar field must be consistent with the energy density obtained from the Schrodinger equation in the non-relativistic regime. To achieve this we had to add some surface terms (total divergencies) to the standard Hamiltonian, which in general will not change the equations of motion, but will redefine energy. As an additional requirement, a Hamiltonian must be able to reproduce the equations of motion directly from Hamilton's equations defined by the principle of the least action. We find that the standard Hamiltonian does not always do so and that the proposed Hamiltonian provides a good non-relativistic limit. This is a hint that something as simple as the Hamiltonian of the real Klein-Gordon scalar field has to be treated carefully. We had illustrated our discussion with an explicit example of the kink solution.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.