Paper detail

A Note on the Cross-Correlation of Costas Permutations

We build on the work of Drakakis et al. (2011) on the maximal cross-correlation of the families of Welch and Golomb Costas permutations. In particular, we settle some of their conjectures. More precisely, we prove two results. First, for a prime $p\ge 5$, the maximal cross-correlation of the family of the $φ(p-1)$ different Welch Costas permutations of $\{1,\ldots,p-1\}$ is $(p-1)/t$, where $t$ is the smallest prime divisor of $(p-1)/2$ if $p$ is not a safe prime and at most $1+p^{1/2}$ otherwise. Here $φ$ denotes Euler's totient function and a prime $p$ is a safe prime if $(p-1)/2$ is also prime. Second, for a prime power $q\ge 4$ the maximal cross-correlation of a subfamily of Golomb Costas permutations of $\{1,\ldots,q-2\}$ is $(q-1)/t-1$ if $t$ is the smallest prime divisor of $(q-1)/2$ if $q$ is odd and of $q-1$ if $q$ is even provided that $(q-1)/2$ and $q-1$ are not prime, and at most $1+q^{1/2}$ otherwise. Note that we consider a smaller family than Drakakis et al. Our family is of size $φ(q-1)$ whereas there are $φ(q-1)^2$ different Golomb Costas permutations. The maximal cross-correlation of the larger family given in the tables of Drakakis et al. is larger than our bound (for the smaller family) for some $q$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.