Paper detail

A Note on Property Testing of the Binary Rank

Let $M$ be a $n\times m$ $(0,1)$-matrix. We define the $s$-binary rank, $br_s(M)$, of $M$ to be the minimal integer $d$ such that there are $d$ monochromatic rectangles that cover all the $1$-entries in the matrix, and each $1$-entry is covered by at most $s$ rectangles. When $s=1$, this is the binary rank,~$br(M)$, known from the literature. Let $R(M)$ and $C(M)$ be the set of rows and columns of~$M$, respectively. We use the result of Sgall (Comb. 1999) to prove that if $M$ has $s$-binary rank at most~$d$, then $|R(M)|\cdot |C(M)|\le {d\choose \le s}2^{d}$ where ${d\choose \le s}=\sum_{i=0}^s{d\choose i}$. This bound is tight; that is, there exists a matrix $M'$ of $s$-binary rank $d$ such that $|R(M')|\cdot |C(M')|= {d\choose \le s}2^{d}$. Using this result, we give a new one-sided adaptive and non-adaptive testers for $(0,1)$-matrices of $s$-binary rank at most $d$ (and exactly $d$) that makes $\tilde O\left({d\choose \le s}2^d/ε\right)$ and $\tilde O\left({d\choose \le s}2^d/ε^2\right)$ queries, respectively. For a fixed $s$, this improves the query complexity of the tester of Parnas et al. (Theory Comput. Syst. 2021) by a factor of $\tilde Θ(2^d)$.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.