Paper detail

A note on measurement of network vulnerability under random and intentional attacks

In this paper we propose an alternative approach for the assessment of network vulnerability under random and intentional attacks as compared to the results obtained from the "vulnerability function" given by Criado et al. [Criado et al. (Int. J. Comput. Math., 86 (2) (2009), pp. 209-218)]. By using spectral and statistical measurements, we assess robustness as the antonym to vulnerability of complex networks and suggest a tentative ranking for vulnerability, based on the interpretation of quantified network characteristics. We conclude that vulnerability function, derived from the network's degree distribution and its variations only, is not general enough to reflect the lack of robustness due to the specific configurations in graphs with hierarchical or centralized structures. The spectral and statistical metrics, on the other hand, capture different aspects of network topology which provide a more thorough assessment of network vulnerability.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.