Paper detail

A Note on Hardness of Multiprocessor Scheduling with Scheduling Solution Space Tree

We study the computational complexity of the non-preemptive scheduling problem of a list of independent jobs on a set of identical parallel processors with a makespan minimization objective. We make a maiden attempt to explore the combinatorial structure showing the exhaustive solution space of the problem by defining the \textit{Scheduling Solution Space Tree (SSST)} data structure. The properties of the \textit{SSST} are formally defined and characterized through our analytical results. We develop a unique technique to show the problem $\mathcal{NP}$ using the SSST and the \textit{Weighted Scheduling Solution Space Tree (WSSST)} data structures. We design the first non-deterministic polynomial-time algorithm named \textit{Magic Scheduling (MS)} for the problem based on the reduction framework. We also define a new variant of multiprocessor scheduling by including the user as an additional input parameter. We formally establish the complexity class of the variant by the reduction principle. Finally, we conclude the article by exploring several interesting open problems for future research investigation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.