Paper detail

A note on $f^\pm$-Zagreb indices in respect of Jaco Graphs, $J_n(1), n \in \Bbb N$ and the introduction of Khazamula irregularity

The topological indices $irr(G)$ related to the \emph{first Zagreb index,} $M_1(G)$ and the \emph{second Zagreb index,} $M_2(G)$ are the oldest irregularity measures researched. Alberton $[3]$ introduced the \emph{irregularity} of $G$ as $irr(G) = \sum\limits_{e \in E(G)}imb(e), imb(e) = |d(v) - d(u)|_{e=vu}$. In the paper of Fath-Tabar $[7]$, Alberton's indice was named the \emph{third Zagreb indice} to conform with the terminology of chemical graph theory. Recently Ado et.al. $[1]$ introduced the topological indice called \emph{total irregularity}. The latter could be called the \emph{fourth Zagreb indice}. we define the $\pm$\emph{Fibonacci weight,} $f^\pm_i$ of a vertex $v_i$ to be $-f_{d(v_i)},$ if $d(v_i)$ is uneven and $f_{d(v_i)}$, if $d(v_i)$ is even. From the aforesaid we define the $f^\pm$-Zagreb indices. This paper presents introductory results for the undirected underlying graphs of Jaco Graphs, $J_n(1), n \leq 12$. For more on Jaco Graphs $J_n(1)$ see $[9, 10]$. Finally we introduce the \emph{Khazamula irregularity} as a new topological variant.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.