Paper detail

A note on concatenation of quasi-Monte Carlo and plain Monte Carlo rules in high dimensions

In this note, we study a concatenation of quasi-Monte Carlo and plain Monte Carlo rules for high-dimensional numerical integration in weighted function spaces. In particular, we consider approximating the integral of periodic functions defined over the $s$-dimensional unit cube by using rank-1 lattice point sets only for the first $d\, (<s)$ coordinates and random points for the remaining $s-d$ coordinates. We prove that, by exploiting a decay of the weights of function spaces, almost the optimal order of the mean squared worst-case error is achieved by such a concatenated quadrature rule as long as $d$ scales at most linearly with the number of points. This result might be useful for numerical integration in extremely high dimensions, such as partial differential equations with random coefficients for which even the standard fast component-by-component algorithm is considered computationally expensive.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.