Paper detail

A note on Bödewadt-Hartmann layers

This paper addresses the problem of axisymetric rotating flows bounded by a fixed horizontal plate and subject to a permanent, uniform, vertical magnetic field (the so-called Bödewadt-Hartmann problem). The aim is to find out which one of the Coriolis or the Lorentz force dominates the dynamics (and hence the boundary layer thickness) when their ratio, represented by the Elsasser number $A$, varies. After a short review of existing linear solutions of the semi infinite Ekman-Hartmann problem, weakly non-linear analytical solutions as well as fully non-linear numerical solutions are given. The case of a rotating vortex in a finite depth fluid layer is then studied, first when the flow is steady under a forced rotation and second for spin-down from some initial state. The angular velocity in the first case and decay time in the second are obtained analytically as a function of $A$ using the weakly non linear results of the semi-infinite Bödewadt-Hartmann problem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.